Rubinstein v. Brownell, Attorney General of United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentProctor, Circuit Judge
(dissenting)’.
The majority opinion holds that upon the present record the Attorney General has no authority to arrest Rubinstein while judicial review is pending and that an arrest would be a clear abuse of discretion. They conclude that the “question of detention must be decided in accordance with the principles applicable in habeas corpus proceedings.” They remand the case for further proceedings, with directions to issue a preliminary injunction against the arrest of Rubinstein unless adequate reasons are shown.
It seems to me confusing, if not misleading, to involve the question of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Perry v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Massachusetts State Grange v. BentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Wis. Tel. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. RubinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.