Legal Opinion
Coollick v. Town of Windham
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 22, 1986No. 4029PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The plaintiff is appealing from a judgment rendered upon the decision of the trial court dismissing his suit against the defendants. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The facts underlying this action are as follows. On June 16,1982, the plaintiff, Richard Coollick, a regular uniformed member of the Windham (formerly Willimantic) police department, underwent coronary bypass surgery. Thereafter, the plaintiff applied for workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to General…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Quimby v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Mora v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Caltabiano v. PhillipsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- McFarland v. Department of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Martin v. Reliance InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.