Legal Opinion

Saracino v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 29, 2008No. AC 28588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Geri B. Saracino, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion to dismiss her action filed by the defendants, Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (the Hartford), 1 and John D. Hale. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly dismissed her action on the ground that it was barred by the prior pending action doctrine. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. The plaintiff starting working for the Hartford in approximately April, 1990,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunting v. ChambersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. ParadisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Hotshoe Enterprises, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Massad v. City of New LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Saracino v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2007

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saracino v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Saracino v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API