Legal Opinion

Collins v. Maude

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1904No. L.A. No. 1206PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Plaintiffs bring the action to foreclose a mortgage on property in Riverside County, given by defendant to secure her promissory note for two thousand dollars, May 27, 1892, due five years after date, with ten per cent annual interest. The note and mortgage were given to Julia Mann, but the money was furnished by Bridget Collins, to whom Julia executed an assignment. Bridget came from Ireland about 1865 and took service as a cook with defendant at St. Louis, Missouri, and worked for her sixteen or seventeen years, and it was there she accumulated this money. Her two brothers,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Estate of AppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API