Legal Opinion

People v. Kuntz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 8, 1996No. 95SA366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline proceeding, Samuel Osborn Kuntz, Jr., has admitted in a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, that he seriously neglected *1111three separate client matters. The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months and undergo reinstatement proceedings. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommended discipline. We accept the conditional admission and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. GenchiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KuntzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API