State v. Aycoth

-There was plenary evidence- to withstand Aycoth’s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit and to support the verdict: The only serious question presented is whether Aycoth was materially prejudiced by the incident set forth below.. During the cross-examination of Deputy Sheriff Frank Fowler, a witness for the State, by counsel for Shadrick, the following occurred: •

“Q. Did you make any identification of the ownership of the automobile, do-you know of your Own knowledge who owns it? (The reference is to the automobile in possession of Aycoth and Shadrick at the time of their arrest.) '

“A.…