Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Green & Flinn, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Wolcott, Ch.,
after making the foregoing statement, delivering the opinion of the Court:
There are eighteen assignments of error. Rather than set them out in detail, it will be more convenient to dispose of them by stating the propositions of law which they raise and announcing our views thereon.
The propositions thus raised by the assignments of error are:(1) That the court below erred in refusing to instruct the jury in accordance with the eleventh prayer of the defendant below, as follows:
“Where the presumption of negligent construction or operation arises from the fact that the fire was set…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Henderson v. Phila. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
- Shelly v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Remington Machine Co. v. Wilmington Candy Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1907
- Director General of Railroads v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1921
- Creasy v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turner v. VineyardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Kent v. ParkerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- Kent v. ParkerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.