Legal Opinion

Kent v. Parker

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 26, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

89 A.2d 133 (1952)

KENT

v.

PARKER.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

May 26, 1952.

Everett F. Warrington, of Georgetown, for defendant, plaintiff in error.

Samuel R. Russell, of Tunnell & Tunnell, Georgetown, for plaintiff, defendant in error.

Before SOUTHERLAND, C. J., WOLCOTT, J., and RICHARDS, P. J.

SOUTHERLAND, Chief Justice.

Two questions are presented:

1. Was the plaintiff below (herein called "plaintiff") guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law?

2. Did the trial court err in the admission of evidence offered (a) in support of plaintiff's claim for medical expenses and (b) in support of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Remington Machine Co. v. Wilmington Candy Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1907
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Green & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. Stellar v. LongSuperior Court of Delaware · 1916
  4. Kent v. ParkerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bellanca Corporation v. BellancaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  2. Rochester v. KatalanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  3. McKeough v. WitmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
  4. Hamilton v. WrangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  5. Bellanca Corporation v. BellancaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API