Legal Opinion
Turnbull & Turnbull v. Ara Transportation, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 17, 1990No. C002975PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARLER, J.
Defendant ARA Transportation, Inc. (ARA), appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found ARA had sold its bus transportation services at below its cost of providing the services with the purpose of injuring competitors or destroying competition in violation of Business and Professions Code section 17043 (hereafter all undesignated section references are to this code). The jury awarded plaintiff Turnbull & Turnbull, doing business as Sullivan & Co. (Sullivan), $259,568 in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages.
On appeal, ARA contends the judgment should be…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Wage & Hour LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bay Guardian Co. v. New Times Media LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Brewer v. Premier Golf Properties, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.