Legal Opinion

Hill v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1974No. L.A. 30172PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

Frank Hill, who is charged by information with attempted burglary, seeks mandamus to compel respondent court to issue an order directing the People to permit him to examine and copy “the felony conviction record, and the arrest and detention records of Harry Sillence.”

The public defender who represents petitioner made a pretrial motion for discovery of the foregoing records. A supporting declaration by the public defender alleged on information and belief that “the Los Angeles Police Department and/or the District Attorney’s Office of Los Angeles have in their possession or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. KaurishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. SeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API