Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Blythe

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1893No. 14837PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a family allowance. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from an order granting a family allowance to Florence Blythe. Upon the hearing of the petition for the allowance counsel for the applicant introduced in evidence the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the decree heretofore made and entered in the action of Blythe v. Ayers, wherein it is found and adjudged that Florence Blythe is the lawful child and heir of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased. The petitioner, aside from certain matters pertaining to property, rested her .application upon the foregoing evidence. Appellants thereupon requested the court to grant a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webb v. . BuckelewNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Naftzger v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hills v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Feeney v. HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API