Legal Opinion

Gigoux v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1921No. 23,075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Miami district court; Jabez O. Rankin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff, J. F. Gigoux, against Charles Griffith, upon a promissory note executed by Griffith to the Denver, Laramie & Northwestern Railroad, which had been transferred to plaintiff. The execution of the note was admitted but defendant alleged that it had been procured through *276fraudulent representations of the payee, of which the plaintiff had knowledge, and that he was not a holder in due course. There was a further defense that the note was barred by the statute of limitations.

It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gigoux v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Brock v. FrancisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Simpson v. Rice, Friedman & Markwell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Gigoux v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Dusenberry v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Young v. NewboldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Mitchell v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Mingenback v. MingenbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Shilling v. OctavioOhio Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API