Legal Opinion

Gigoux v. Moore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1919No. 22,056PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Thq action was one by the indorsee of a promissory note, to recover from the maker. The defense was that the note was procured by fraud, that.negotiation to the plaintiff was in violation of an agreement, and that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The Denver, Laramie & Northwestern Railroad Company was a corporation organized for the purposes indicated by its name. Three subsidiary corporations were organized for purposes related to the railroad project.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. Independence Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. People's Bank of Minneapolis v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Hess v. Iowa Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Gigoux v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Farmers State Bank v. BrennekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API