Legal Opinion

Dusenberry v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1898No. 341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Shawnee district- court; Z. T. Hazen, judgb.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J. :

This action was brought by Dusenberry against E. Bennett and É. R. Bennett, copartners as E. Bennett & Son, on an indorsement upon a promissory note. The petition and precipe were filed on June 18, 1894. The summons was issued returnable according to law, but with no amount indorsed thereon *124for which, with interest, judgment would be taken if the defendants failed to answer. No appearance was made by either of the defendants in the district court, and, on July 30, 1894, judgment was rendered for plaintiff, upon default, for $1200 and costs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foreman v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Simpson v. Rice, Friedman & Markwell Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  3. Bassett v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tootle, Hanna & Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Overland Gold Mining Co. v. McMasterUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lawton v. NicholasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  4. Gigoux v. GriffithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Johnson v. LarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API