Legal Opinion

City of Hackensack v. Rubinstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1962PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schettino, J.

In 1960 appellant, City of Hackensack, completed an extensive reassessment of all realty located within the city. Thereafter, more than 300 taxpayers, including the respondents, appealed to the Bergen County Board of Taxation seeking a reduction of their assessments. Erom determinations reducing the assessments, Hackensack appealed to the Division of Tax Appeals, Department of the Treasury (hereinafter the “Division”) and there the appeals contesting reductions of respondents’ assessments were dismissed for failure to serve copies thereof…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ford v. GenereuxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Walling v. Brooklyn Braid Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Ross v. Hawkeye InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Ross v. Hawkeye InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. MacLean v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pantasote Co. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. General Trading Co. v. Taxation Div. DirectorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Samuel Hird & Sons, Inc. v. City of GarfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Academy Spires, Inc. v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API