Ross v. Hawkeye Insurance

I. It is urged that the assignments' of errors are insufficient, and should not be considered. One assignment fairly presents the question of the correctness of each instruction given by the court, and is sufficient., The plaintiff was the holder of a policy of insurance against loss by fire, issued by the defendant company. The time of insurance, by the terms of the policy,, began April 18, 1889, and terminated April 18, 1890. The property insured was destroyed by fire July 2,1889. The premium for the insurance was settled by note due July 1, 1889, and was unpaid at the date of the fire. The…