Legal Opinion

MacLean v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1928No. 26,806PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendants appealed from an order denying their application to vacate a judgment as default and for leave to answer and defend.

Plaintiff is a lawyer living and practicing in Minneapolis. He sned defendants to collect $25 for professional services. Time for answering expired December 12, 1927. Not having received an answer be entered judgment on December 14, 1927. Defendants reside in St. Paul. Their counsel dictated an answer on December 12, 1927, and one of their employes claims to have mailed it on that day. Plaintiff’s affidavit says he received the answer on December 16, 1927, and that it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurley Bros. v. HaluptzokSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Kay v. ElsholtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Hackensack v. RubinsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Wasden v. FoellIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Hecker v. SadlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API