Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sonic Development Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on separate motions by three of the defendants for summary judgment and a motion by one defendant to compel discovery and for costs. Plaintiff’s cause of action arises from the breakdown of three air compressors used in plaintiff’s pollution control system at its Kansas City, Kansas production plant. Plaintiff brings suit against the manufacturer of the air compressors and various parties who selected the particular type of air compressors used, installed them and maintained them. The court will discuss each…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roto-Lith, Ltd. v. F. P. Bartlett & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Barber v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Dorothy Williams v. Borden, Inc., and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Daitom, Inc. v. Pennwalt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Ritchie Enterprises v. Honeywell Bull, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Comeau v. RuppDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.