Legal Opinion

Daitom, Inc. v. Pennwalt Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1984No. 82-1813PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment against Daitom, Inc. (Dai-tom), the plaintiff below. The result was dismissal by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas of all three counts of Daitom’s complaint.

Daitom had brought this diversity action in federal court on March 7, 1980 against Pennwalt Corporation and its Stokes Vacuum Equipment Division (Pennwalt). Counts I and II of Daitom’s complaint alleged breach of various express and implied warranties and Count III alleged negligent design and manufacture…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Janikowski v. Bendix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Altronics of Bethlehem, Inc. Altronics of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Repco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology and the Software Link, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Save Palisade Fruitlands v. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API