Swim v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.
The petition herein is entitled “Petition for a Writ of Mandate,” hut the prayer thereof is, in substance, for a writ of review. The writ which was issued by us at petitioner’s request was in effect a writ of review, though entitled writ of mandate, and in response to it the record of the lower court has been certified to. us. The facts are as follows: The petitioner herein recovered a judgment in the justice’s court of the city and county of San Francisco, January 16, 1922, against one S. L. Mash, defendant, amounting to $92.93. The defendant perfected an appeal to the superior court of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by14 opinions
- A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. First Presbyterian Church v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Pacific Gas Radiator Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.