Legal Opinion

Detroit Graphite Co. v. Carney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1935No. 24004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This is an action by the Detroit Graphite Company, a corporation, against J. R. Carney, an individual doing business as the J; R. Carney Company, Charles M. Dunning Construction Company, a corporation, Waite Phillips, and the Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd., of London. The questions involved arise under the materialman’s lien law of the state.

The trial resulted in a money judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant J. R. Carney, and in a judgment denying recovery in favor of plaintiff against any of the other defendants. The defendants, other than J. R.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MashoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Hafker v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Oligschlager v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Nelson & Castrup v. CulverWashington Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. G. R. Sponaugle & Sons, Inc. v. McKnight Construction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  4. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd. v. Aquarius Industries, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Dong Yang Corp. v. G.C. CorporationSuperior Court of Guam · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API