Legal Opinion

Al Carranza v. madrigal/investigation Services, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2015No. CV-14-0192-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a) requires a trial court to allow a reasonable opportunity to substitute parties before it dismisses an action for lack of prosecution by the real party in interest. We hold that in order to substitute a party, one must file a Rule 15(a) motion to amend, and the motion may be denied if the court finds undue delay or prejudice.

I

¶ 2 Martha and Mario Madrigal brought a wrongful death action against the City of Mesa. Attorney Edward Fitzhugh represented the Madrigals, but later withdrew. The contingent fee agreement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Owen v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grand v. NacchioArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Spitz v. Bache & Company, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MorariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Ghb v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. Lattin v. ShamrockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. Metro Phx Bank v. RpmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. Nicdon v. Desert MountainCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API