Al Carranza v. madrigal/investigation Services, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BRUTINEL,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a) requires a trial court to allow a reasonable opportunity to substitute parties before it dismisses an action for lack of prosecution by the real party in interest. We hold that in order to substitute a party, one must file a Rule 15(a) motion to amend, and the motion may be denied if the court finds undue delay or prejudice.
I
¶ 2 Martha and Mario Madrigal brought a wrongful death action against the City of Mesa. Attorney Edward Fitzhugh represented the Madrigals, but later withdrew. The contingent fee agreement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Owen v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Grand v. NacchioArizona Supreme Court · 2010
- Spitz v. Bache & Company, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2011
3Cited by6 opinions
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MorariCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Ghb v. SolomonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Lattin v. ShamrockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Metro Phx Bank v. RpmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Nicdon v. Desert MountainCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.