Legal Opinion

Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2011No. CV-10-0292-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a) requires every action to be “prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.” An action cannot be dismissed for failure to name the proper party, however, “until a reasonable time has been allowed after objection” for the real party in interest to ratify, join, or be substituted into the action. Ariz. R. Civ. P. 17(a). We hold that Rule 17(a) does not require a plaintiff to show that an initial failure to name the real party in interest resulted from an understandable mistake or difficulty in identifying the proper party.

I

¶…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Morton v. GTE Southwest Inc. (Wieburg)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Esposito v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. State v. AguilarArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Owen v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rivera-Longoria v. SlaytonArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Searchtoppers.com, L.L.C. v. TrustCash LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Al Carranza v. madrigal/investigation Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Wyatt v. Vanguard Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. American Asphalt & Grading Co. v. CMX, L.L.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API