Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Marquez

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 2007No. H029580PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Petitioner Vincent Marquez allegedly violated conditions of his parole, and was arrested and returned to custody on July 22, 2005. According to time lines agreed to by the State of California in Valdivia v. Davis (E.D.Cal. 2002) 206 F.Supp.2d 1068 and set out in Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger (E.D.Cal. Mar. 9, 2004, Civ. S-94-0671 LKK/GGH) (Valdivia), of which we took judicial notice, a parolee is supposed to receive a probable cause hearing within 10 business days of the day of receipt of notification of the parole violation charges, and a revocation of parole hearing within 35…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ahn v. GEO Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. C&C Properties, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. Ehrenreich v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. Estate of Linda Miller v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API