Legal Opinion

C&C Properties, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 27, 2019No. 1:14-cv-01889Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 C & C PROPERTIES, et al., No. 1:14-cv-01889-DAD-JLT 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER RESOLVING VARIOUS POST- TRIAL MOTIONS 14 SHELL PIPELINE COMPANY, et al., (Doc. Nos. 250, 257, 258, 265, 266, 267) 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on various post-trial motions. At the conclusion of trial, 18 judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants on plaintiff’s cause of action 19 for trespass. (Doc. No. 29.) Defendants Alon Bakersfield Property, Inc. and Paramount 20 Petroleum…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API