Legal Opinion

Avondale Heights Company v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 24, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis

Affirming.

This is an action upon an injunction bond to recover attorney fees and damages for the depreciation and loss of use of real property while the order of injunction was in force.

The Avondale Heights Company in 1913 acquired a subdivision lying about a mile west of the corporate limits of the city of Paducah, which had belonged to the .Gregory Heights Company. In making the subdivision, an open space had been left marked “Reserve,” and in 1922 the appellant proposed to sell lots carved from the space so marked. It was thereupon sued by Xenoline Morris…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citizens' Trust & Guaranty Co. v. Ohio Valley Tie Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Morris v. Avondale Heights CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Bartram v. Ohio & Big Sandy R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Proctor v. Avondale Heights Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Elkhorn Coal Co. v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strong v. DuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Thomas' Ex'r v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Holt's Adm'r v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Brundige v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API