Legal Opinion
Holt's Adm'r v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided January 31, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
There is no dispute as to either the law or the-facts in this case. The contention is as to the application of the one to the other. The ease is a sequel to Johnson v. Holt’s Administrator (Johnson v. Sullivan), 235 Ky. 519, 31 S. W. (2d) 895. As stated in that, opinion, O. T. Holt’s administrator recovered judgment for damages against Dr. J. S. Johnson. Thereafter he filed a motion to set it aside as being void for-want of jurisdiction. Dr. Johnson also filed an independent suit, which embraced the sheriff and his deputy, to prevent a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cumb. Tel'p & Tel'g Co. v. City of HickmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Bartram v. Ohio & Big Sandy R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Johnson v. Holt's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- New National Turnpike Co. v. DulaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Strong v. DuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Nat. Red Cross v. Brandeis MacHinery & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Thomas' Ex'r v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Holliday v. SpharCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Dunn v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Eddington's Adm'x v. EddingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.