Bartram v. Ohio & Big Sandy R. R.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
*101Opinion op the Court by
Judge O’Rear
Reversing.
January 15, 1891, the Ohio & Big Sandy R. R. Co. instituted a suit in the Lawrence circuit court against S. W. Wooten and others, claiming to own a certain tract of .land and all the timber growing upon it, and certain timber on the land which had been recently cut down. The suit was to recover the timber from the defendants, ■who were asserting title to it. The action was probably in the nature of trespass. It involved the title to the land as well as to the timber described. An injunction was sued out against the defendants restraining them from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edwards v. BodineNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Fagg's Admr. v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Meysenburg v. SchlieperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- New National Turnpike Co. v. DulaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Tyler & Apperson v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Princeton v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Prager's Paris Fashion v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Beech v. American Surety Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Elkhorn Coal Co. v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Holt's Adm'r v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.