United States v. Hubbard
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
DARDEN, Judge:
The trial counsel in this case was the deputy staff judge advocate. In that position he was the immediate superior officer of the trial defense counsel and the assistant defense counsel, and he endorsed their efficiency reports. Whether such a relationship inherently deprived the appellant of due process is the question that engages the Court’s attention.
A general court-martial at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, tried the appellant for unpremeditated murder and an unauthorized absence. It convicted him of voluntary manslaughter and of an absence of a period…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. KitchensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. HayesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. CaritativoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.