Cornelius Fullbright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
Appellant and two co-defendants were found guilty in a non-jury trial of violating five sections of the federal Internal Revenue Liquor Laws. 1 Appellant appeals, claiming that his conviction was based upon illegally obtained evidence.
These are the facts without substantial dispute: On the night of April 6, 1967, federal investigators for the Alcohol Tax Unit of the Internal Revenue Service, acting upon information received from an unnamed informant, who they stated was a “reliable” source of information, went upon the farm of one Marzett, a co-defendant of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. Miguel Angel TabordaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Everhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- United States v. Felder M. Davis and Houston Felder DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Commonwealth v. HernleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.