Legal Opinion

Everhart v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 1975No. [No. 44, September Term, 1974.]PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

The petitioner, Michael Ashton Everhart, the lessee of a farmhouse upon the Nathan Doody farm, upon his trial in the Circuit Court for Frederick County was found guilty by a jury (Judge Samuel W. Barrick presiding) of “maintaining a common nuisance” in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Vol.) Art. 27, § 286 (a)(5). 1 He also was convicted of possession of a controlled dangerous substance — marijuana — in violation of Art. 27, § 287 (a). 2

Admitted into evidence at his trial were approximately 200 items, including various types of pipes for smoking marijuana, numerous scales, weights,…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Doering v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Duncan and Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Bartram v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API