Legal Opinion

SORIANO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1988No. ID 3081PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision *3081 MATTER OF SORIANO In Visa Petition Proceedings A-27259'736 Decided by Board October 5, 1988 (1) Where a visa petition has once been denied based on a finding that the marriage was entered into solely to bestow an immigration benefit, the petitioner bears a heavy burden of proof with respect to any subsequently filed visa petition involv- ing the same beneficiary. (2) A petitioner may be put on notice of evidentiary requirements by means such as a requirement in the regulations that a particular document be submitted with the visa petition; a notice of intent to deny, letter,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  3. Sang Chul Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. LAUREANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
  5. Hurn Bu Roe v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Emmanuel Senyo Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. VELARDEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
  3. Ramirez-Alejandre v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. ADENIJIiBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  5. Vasquez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API