Legal Opinion
VELARDE
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3463PublishedCited by 215 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 253
(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3463 In re Mario Eduardo VELARDE-Pacheco, Respondent File A70 178 696 - San Diego Decided March 6, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A properly filed motion to reopen for adjustment of status based on a marriage entered into after the commencement of proceedings may be granted in the exercise of discretion, notwithstanding the pendency of a visa petition filed on the alien’s behalf, where: (1) the motion to reopen is timely filed; (2) the motion is not numerically barred by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by215 opinions
- Gurmeet Singh Malhi, AKA Parpal Singh Malli Davinder Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Anis Shokri Salama Malty v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Maria Isabel Gonzalez De Martinez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ahmed v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Deu Thapa v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.