Legal Opinion
Sang Chul Bark v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1975No. 72--3143PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner was denied adjustment of status from student visitor to permanent resident, pursuant to section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“the Act”) (8 U.S.C. § 1255), and he seeks review. Respondent has conceded that the denial was based solely on the Immigration Judge’s conclusion, affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals, that petitioner was ineligible for adjustment of status because the marriage upon which he based his application was a sham.
Petitioner and his wife had been sweethearts for several years while'they were living in their…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Emmanuel Senyo Agyeman v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Laura Luis Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jocelyn Agonoy Nakamoto v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- LAUREANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
- Ysidro Alberto Oropeza-Wong v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.