Legal Opinion

National Bonded Warehouse, Ass'n, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 27, 1989No. Court 87-02-00270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

RESTANI, Judge:

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for rehearing pursuant to rule 59(e) of the Rules of the Court of International Trade, asking this court to reconsider its December 23, 1987 decision granting defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581 (1982 & Supp. IV 1986). This court granted plaintiff's motion and following rehearing reverses its earlier decision for reasons discussed herein.

DISCUSSION

In its opinion of December 23, 1987, this court originally held that the term “all charges or exactions,” as set forth in 19 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Utex International Inc., and Sentry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Di Jub Leasing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
  3. Puget Sound Freight Lines v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  4. National Bonded Warehouse Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conoco Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones BoardUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  2. National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Ass'n of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. Phibro Energy, Inc. v. FranklinUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. Pope Products, Div. of Purex v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  5. Pope Products, division of Purex v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API