Legal Opinion

Pope Products, Div. of Purex v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 18, 1991No. Court No. 89-05-00254Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Restani, Judge:

Pursuant to the instructions contained in this court’s opinion in Pope Products, Division of Purex v. United States, 15 CIT 279, Slip Op. 91-50 (June 18,1991) (Pope), the parties in this case have filed supplemental briefs concerning jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158l(i) and the statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2636(h). For the reasons provided herein, the court finds that although residual subject matter jurisdiction over this type of action may exist, plaintiffs case is barred for statute of limitations reasons. Accordingly, defendant’s motion to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Old Republic Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  4. Farrell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. Wally Packaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API