Martin v. Mobley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bussey, Justice.
In this action plaintiff-respondent recovered a verdict for actual damages in the amount of $7,500.00 for personal injuries and property damage allegedly sustained in an inter-sectional collision between two compact automobiles. Defendant appeals from the denial of her motions for a judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial. Since there is no substantial conflict in the evidence as to the occurrence of the collision, a detailed review of the evidence thereabout would serve no useful purpose. It is necessary to only briefly describe the manner in which the collision…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mullinax v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Merrill v. BartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Stone v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Holroyd v. RequaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Pearson v. BridgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Keene v. CNA Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.