Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Bridges

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 19, 2001No. 25263PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Chief Justice:

We granted certiorari in this medical malpractice action to review the Court of Appeals’ decision upholding the jury’s $755,000 damage award to Belinda Sue Pearson (“Pearson”).

Factual/Procedural Background

On May 1, 1992, Dr. Tommy L. Bridges (“Dr. Bridges”) examined Pearson, then a twenty-six year old, who had known problems with gallstones. Dr. Bridges recommended Pearson have her gallbladder removed. Because it was less painful and recovery time was shorter, Dr. Bridges recommended a laparoscopic surgery instead of an open procedure. During the laparoscopic gallbladder…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armstrong Ex Rel. Estate of Armstrong v. WeilandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Haltiwanger v. BarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Martin v. MobleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Kelly v. BrazellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Pearson v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Willis Ex Rel. Willis v. WuSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Burroughs v. WorshamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Holroyd v. RequaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Pilgrim v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Weaver Ex Rel. Estate of Weaver v. LentzCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API