Legal Opinion

Holroyd v. Requa

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 24, 2004No. 3852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, A.J.:

Christopher Holroyd, Gillian Holroyd, and American AVK Company (collectively “Respondents”) brought this action against their insurance agent, Michael Requa, alleging various causes of action for misrepresentation, fraud, and negligence stemming from Requa’s solicitation and sale of a health insurance policy to Respondents. Requa denied these allegations and claimed Respondents’ state law causes of action were preempted and barred by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 to -1461 (Supp.2003) (“ERISA”). The jury rendered a verdict in favor of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Coyne & Delany Co. v. SelmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miara v. First Allmerica Financial Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  2. Chastain v. HiltabidleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Ashenfelder v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Ashenfelder v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Tucker v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API