Holroyd v. Requa
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CURETON, A.J.:
Christopher Holroyd, Gillian Holroyd, and American AVK Company (collectively “Respondents”) brought this action against their insurance agent, Michael Requa, alleging various causes of action for misrepresentation, fraud, and negligence stemming from Requa’s solicitation and sale of a health insurance policy to Respondents. Requa denied these allegations and claimed Respondents’ state law causes of action were preempted and barred by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 to -1461 (Supp.2003) (“ERISA”). The jury rendered a verdict in favor of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Coyne & Delany Co. v. SelmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miara v. First Allmerica Financial Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Chastain v. HiltabidleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Ashenfelder v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Ashenfelder v. City of GeorgetownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Tucker v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.