Legal Opinion

Grissom v. Beidleman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1912No. 3283PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S■ Stanfield, Judge. Action by George C. Beidleman and others against Joseph M. Grissom and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The only question to be determined in this proceeding is whether the contract entered into, on which the action was based, to wit, that between Leah Gresham, a minor, under eighteen years of age, by Vassie Gresham, as next friend, and George C. Beidleman, an attorney, in which the latter was employed as attorney to prosecute an action in her name by said next friend to recover her interest in certain lands, was voidable.

“A minor cannot give a delegation of power, nor under the age of eighteen, make a contract relating to real property, or any interest therein, or relating to any personal…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. MacGreal v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Askey v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Englebert v. TroxellNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Searcy v. HunterTexas Supreme Court · 1891

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Statler v. DodsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Leonard v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Matter of Estate of BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API