Legal Opinion
Baeth v. Hoisveen
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1968No. Civ. 8417PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaulson, Judge
(on reassignment).
This matter comes to us pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 32-24 of the North Dakota Century Code, upon a question of law certified by the district court of Bur-leigh County, North Dakota. The action was originally brought under the Declaratory Judgments Act (Ch. 32-23, N.D.C.C.), asking that the plaintiffs’ rights as owners of the land overlying underground water in a well-defined stream be adjudicated, and that Section 61-01-01, N.D.C.C., and Section 47-01-13, N.D.C.C., which has since been repealed, be construed by the court so as not to violate certain inchoate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Bigelow v. DraperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Baumann v. SmrhaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1956
- Knight v. GrimesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- United Plainsmen Ass'n v. North Dakota State Water Conservation CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.