Legal Opinion

State v. DiChristofaro

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 27, 2004No. 2003-416-C.APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court on April 7, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. Neither party has filed a supplemental memorandum. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memo-randa of the parties, we are satisfied that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal at this time. 1

On the evening of June 23, 2001, Brittany Atella (Brittany) and Aimee Holihen (Aimee), both fourteen years old, walked from a friend’s home in West Warwick to…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OteroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. State v. BleauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  3. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  4. State v. D'AMARIOSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  5. State v. DellaySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HallenbeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. State v. PinedaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. Larngar v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. State v. Jeffrey MartinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. State v. Kimberly FrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API