Legal Opinion

Bredemeier v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1997No. 96CA0977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge JONES.

In this action to recover personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under an automobile insurance policy, defendant, Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers), appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Audrey Brede-meier, following a trial to the court. We reverse and remand the cause with directions.

While walking through a parking lot at night, plaintiff tripped and fell over a speed bump and was injured. She sought PIP benefits under a policy of insurance issued by Farmers for a vehicle owned by Richard and Joyce Larson. Plaintiff claims that her injuries arose out of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Mason v. Celina Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Azar v. Employers Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Kohl v. Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hisaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Georgeson v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1998
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KastnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Bredemeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API