Legal Opinion
United States v. Tull
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 28, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-688-NPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
This matter came on for a trial by the Court sitting without a jury.
The government filed its original complaint on July 1, 1981. On April 2, 1982, the government amended its complaint. During the course of the trial, the government sought leave to amend its complaint again. Leave was granted, and on October 5, 1982, the government’s second amended complaint was filed.
In claim (1) of the second amended complaint, the government charged that between July 1975 and the present, the defendant, without benefit of a permit issued by the United States Army…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. John Pozsgai, Gizella Pozsgai, Mercer Wrecking & Recycling Corporation, J. Vinch & Sons, Inc. John Pozsgai and Gizella PozsgaiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Edward Lunn TullCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. LambertDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- United States v. LarkinsDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.