Legal Opinion

Poirier v. Gravel

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1891No. 13734PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lcs Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

The plaintiff brought this action in April, 1889, the sum of fifteen hundred dollars on a written instrument, which reads as follows:—

“$1,700. Los Angeles, Cal., February 9, 1888. ’’
“ I hereby promise to pay to Godfrey Poirier the sum of seventeen hundred dollars out of the net proceeds of *81the products, whether mineral, timber, wood, or any other thing, raised or taken from section 3 of township 11 north, range 15 west, of the San Bernardino meridian, in'Kern County, state of California, the said sum to be so paid in installments in such amounts and at such times as I shall realize…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Love v. MaburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cooley v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Bagley v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Spangenberg v. SpangenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Ebberts v. Carpenter Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Carter v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API