Legal Opinion
Juan Valdez v. Mark A. Rosenbaum Al Terrault Julie Latuska Bill Parker George Gore Debbie Miller Allen Cooper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2002No. 01-35300PublishedCited by 234 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
In this civil rights action, Juan Valdez alleges that his constitutional rights were violated during his pretrial detention in the Alaska Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility (“CIPT”). Valdez was a federal detainee who was held in CIPT pursuant to an agreement between the state of Alaska and the U.S. Marshal Service. After he was convicted in federal court, Valdez filed this suit against Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark A. Rosenbaum (“Rosenbaum”) and various Alaska state officials and CIPT administrators (“state officials”), alleging that they had imposed unlawful…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Christopher I. Simmons v. Sacramento County Superior Court Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and R. Duane SkeltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Demery v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Yusef Steele v. Warden CicchiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.