Legal Opinion

Mukand International Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 31, 2006No. Slip Op. 06-130; Court 05-00108PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON, Judge.

Plaintiffs commenced this action to challenge as unlawful the liquidation instructions issued by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) pursuant to the final results of an administrative review ’Of an antidumping duty order and to void the resulting liquidations. Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1) or for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(5). Although the Court has subject matter jurisdiction to review plaintiffs’ claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  2. Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  3. JBF RAK LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  4. Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  5. Parkdale International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API