Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Diamond

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 31, 1993No. 11845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant appeals from the orders of the trial court granting the plaintiff’s motions for contempt, modification of child support and counsel fees. We reverse the trial court’s orders in part, affirm them in part, and remand the matter for further proceedings.

On appeal, the defendant asserts that the trial court improperly (1) ordered, pursuant to the plaintiff’s motion for modification or motion for contempt, a retroactive modification of child support in contravention of the prohibition against such a retroactive modification contained in General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) and the *735common law…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Sanchione v. SanchioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Paddock v. PaddockConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. New England Savings Bank v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Baker v. Baker, No. Fa86-0322610 (Sep. 18, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  4. Patrick v. Patrick, No. Fa 89 41733 S (Aug. 15, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API