Legal Opinion
New England Savings Bank v. Clark
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 6, 1999No. AC 18161PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*122 Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiff, New England Savings Bank,1 appeals to this court following the trial court’s denial of its motion for postjudgment attorney’s fees filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-400c.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly denied it due process of law by (1) failing to refer the motion to the original finder of fact, (2) failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion and (3) abusing its discretion in denying the motion. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The case has a lengthy history and only the following facts are relevant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Nelson v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Esposito v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. LodriniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Moasser v. Becker, No. Cv 92 0128759 (Jan. 14, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002