Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Patrick, No. Fa 89 41733 S (Aug. 15, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 15, 1994No. FA 89 41733 SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Purtill, Purtill Pfeffer for plaintiff.

Ford, Oberg, Manion Houck and Stephen S. Chinitz Associates for defendant. These motions are the plaintiff's postjudgment motion to modify alimony and the defendant's motion for contempt. The motions were heard jointly by the court.

On April 24, 1991, the court, Dunn, J., dissolved the parties' marriage and rendered judgment which incorporated the provisions of a separation agreement entered into by the parties on the same day. Among the terms of that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Billington v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Yontef v. YontefSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API